1
1
The Los Angeles Lakers are hunting for a forward, and Jonathan Kuminga is their top wish. But there’s a catch—several other teams want him too. If the Lakers can’t sign Kuminga, they’ll need to make a trade. Here are the three best realistic options, ranked from "good but risky" to "dream scenario."
Important: The Lakers have a hole at forward. They really want Jonathan Kuminga, but the Atlanta Hawks, Cleveland Cavaliers, and Minnesota Timberwolves are also chasing him. If Kuminga picks another team, LA must look at the trade market.
What makes a "realistic" trade target?
| Detail | Info |
|---|---|
| Years Left | 4 |
| Total Money | $88,762,439 |
| Risk Level | High — long, expensive commitment |
Callout: Washington might be the best player on this list, but that contract is scary. If he doesn’t work out, the Lakers are stuck with a huge bill for four years. Only do this if Dončić vouches for him.
Strus missed 70 games in 2025-26 after foot surgery (Jones fracture), but looked like his old self immediately upon return.
Callout: Since Cleveland wants to offload his salary, the trade price should be reasonable. Low risk, high reward.
Callout: Jones checks every box: defense, shooting, Dončić experience, short contract. If the Clippers are rebuilding and want picks, the Lakers should absolutely make this call.
| Rank | Player | Team | Contract | Key Strength | Risk Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | P.J. Washington | Mavericks | 4 yrs / $88.8M | Best all-around player, knows Dončić | High (long $) |
| 2 | Max Strus | Cavaliers | 1 yr / $16.7M | Elite shooting + defense, expiring | Low |
| 1 | Derrick Jones Jr. | Clippers | 1 yr / $10.5M | Elite defense + Dončić experience | Low |
Bottom line: If Kuminga says no, Derrick Jones Jr. is the ideal fit — but Max Strus is a fantastic (and possibly cheaper) backup plan. P.J. Washington is talented but only makes sense if the Lakers are certain he’s a long-term piece.
An expiring contract ends after this season. The team doesn’t have to pay the player next year. This makes trades easier because the receiving team (Lakers) isn’t locked into long-term money, and the sending team (Cavs/Clippers) clears cap space for future moves.
It means the player can shoot 3-pointers well enough that defenders must guard them closely. This opens up driving lanes for LeBron James, Luka Dončić, and Austin Reaves. Think of it like spreading out a defense so there’s room to operate.
Sites like Basketball Index track how well players defend specific situations. 94th percentile means the player was better at that specific defensive task than 94% of the league. It’s a fancy way of saying "elite."
If the Clippers aren’t competing for a title this year, they’d rather get draft picks (future assets) than keep a good player on a one-year deal who leaves for nothing in free agency. Rivalries matter less than smart asset management.
Most impactful free agents are already signed. The best players left are either too expensive, don’t fit, or are restricted (their team can match any offer). Trading lets LA target specific players on specific contracts.
Article based on reporting from LakeShowLife, HoopsHype, and Basketball Index analytics.