11
Trump Calls Fund ‘Dead’ — While Defending It Anyway
Trump’s "Anti-Weaponization Fund" Hits a Wall: What You Need to Know
The Big Picture
Imagine a president wants to create a $1.8 billion fund to pay back his political friends who got in trouble with the law. Two Republican senators say "Not so fast!" and are blocking his pick for Attorney General until they get a written promise that this fund is truly dead.
That’s exactly what’s happening in Washington right now. Let’s break it down in simple terms.
What Is This "Anti-Weaponization Fund" Anyway?
Important Point: Despite the fancy name, this fund would have paid money to people prosecuted by the Justice Department — including many involved in the January 6, 2021 Capitol attack.
Here’s the simple version:
- President Trump wanted to create a $1.8 billion compensation fund
- It would go to his allies who he claims were "unfairly targeted" by the Justice Department
- Many potential recipients were charged for their role in the January 6 Capitol riot
- Trump pardoned over 1,500 of these individuals on his first day back in office
Why Are Senators Blocking the AG Nominee?
Two Republican senators — John Cornyn (Texas) and Thom Tillis (North Carolina) — sit on the Senate Judiciary Committee. They’re refusing to vote for Todd Blanche (Trump’s pick for Attorney General) until they get ironclad written guarantees.
Their Two Main Demands:
| Demand | What It Means |
|---|---|
| 1. Fund is permanently dead | Not just "paused" — legally rescinded with no chance of revival |
| 2. Tax audit immunity details | Written clarification that Trump family tax audit protection is limited and backward-looking only |
Key Fact: Both senators are leaving office soon — Tillis is retiring, and Cornyn lost his primary after Trump endorsed his opponent. They have nothing to lose by standing firm.
The Confusing Back-and-Forth
Here’s where it gets messy. Follow the timeline:
Step 1: May
Blanche testifies at his confirmation hearing → says the fund won’t move forward after GOP senators revolt.
Step 2: Last Week
Committee schedules vote on Blanche → Cornyn and Tillis say "not so fast" → vote postponed.
Step 3: Thursday
Trump gets mad → threatens to pull Blanche’s nomination and resubmit next year when these senators are gone.
Step 4: Friday Morning
Trump posts on social media → defends the fund, says Jan. 6 defendants "are suffering still" and "should be given compensation."
Step 5: Friday Late Morning
Trump tells reporters at Camp David → "Administration officials agreed not to have a fund" but he disagrees with that decision.
Step 6: Friday Afternoon
Senator Tillis responds → "The President made it clear today that the so-called Anti Weaponization Fund is still alive, which is exactly why we are attempting to formally end it."
Who’s Really Calling the Shots?
Important Point: Multiple sources blame Boris Epshteyn, a Trump legal adviser, for blocking the agreement that would let Blanche sail through confirmation.
The finger-pointing:
- Cornyn: "Blanche and DOJ were on the same page… but when the president got wind of it, he wasn’t willing to go along."
- Tillis: Calls it an "incompetent personal adviser" to the president causing the holdup.
- White House (Steven Cheung): Denies everything, says Blanche "will be an exceptional Attorney General."
The Bigger Legal Mess
While this nomination drama plays out, there’s another court case heating up:
- Trump sued the IRS (claiming improper audits)
- His administration settled — giving Trump and family immunity from future tax audits
- A federal judge called it "an improper exercise in self-dealing"
- The judge referred one of Trump’s lawyers for potential disciplinary action
- Trump’s team is appealing the ruling
Why this matters: Blanche helped negotiate this settlement while he was Trump’s personal lawyer — now he’s the acting Attorney General overseeing the Justice Department. Critics call this a conflict of interest.
What Other Republicans Are Saying
Even typically Trump-loyal senators are uncomfortable:
| Senator | Quote |
|---|---|
| Thom Tillis (NC) | "The criminals who assaulted police officers and defiled our nation’s Capitol are not ‘great American patriots’ who are ‘victims of government abuse.’" |
| John Kennedy (LA) | "The majority of Senate Republicans aren’t comfortable with the settlement fund… Blanche said it’s dead… but somebody didn’t want to put it in writing." |
What Happens Next?
Numbered Steps — The Path Forward:
- Justice Department drafts new language officially rescinding the May 18 order creating the fund
- Cornyn and Tillis review — they want it in writing, not just verbal promises
- Tax audit immunity clarified — written confirmation it’s limited to past audits only
- Committee vote rescheduled — Chairman Chuck Grassley set it for Tuesday
- Full Senate vote — if committee approves, goes to floor before August recess
Deadline Pressure: Grassley wants Blanche confirmed before the August recess — giving the White House about a week to satisfy two determined senators.
Summary
- Trump wants a $1.8B fund for allies (including Jan. 6 defendants)
- Two GOP senators are blocking his AG pick until they get written proof it’s dead
- Trump keeps undermining his own team by saying the fund should exist
- A legal adviser (Epshteyn) is reportedly the behind-the-scenes blocker
- Separate court ruling calls Trump’s IRS settlement "self-dealing"
- Vote rescheduled for Tuesday — clock is ticking before August break
FAQ
Q: What exactly is the "Anti-Weaponization Fund"?
A: A proposed $1.8 billion fund to compensate people Trump claims were unfairly prosecuted by the Justice Department — many for January 6 Capitol riot charges.
Q: Why do Cornyn and Tillis care so much about getting it in writing?
A: Trump keeps saying contradictory things — his team says "it’s dead," but he personally says "it should exist." The senators want a legal document that can’t be reversed by a future tweet or order.
Q: Who is Todd Blanche?
A: Trump’s former personal defense attorney, now serving as acting Attorney General while awaiting Senate confirmation for the permanent role.
Q: What’s the tax audit immunity issue about?
A: Part of the IRS lawsuit settlement gave Trump and his family protection from future tax audits — potentially covering 100+ Trump Organization subsidiaries. Senators want written proof this protection is limited and retrospective only.
Q: Why is Boris Epshteyn being blamed?
A: Multiple insiders say this Trump legal adviser is blocking the written agreement that would satisfy Cornyn and Tillis, even though Blanche and DOJ lawyers are ready to sign.
Q: When will this be resolved?
A: The committee vote is set for Tuesday. If Cornyn and Tillis get their written guarantees by then, Blanche likely advances. If not, the nomination could stall — or Trump might pull it and try again next year.
