1
1
Imagine you work for a famous radio host. You sign a promise (called an NDA) not to share private information about your boss or their family. Later, you get fired and want to tell your side of the story—but the court says "Nope, you signed the promise, so you have to keep it."
That’s exactly what happened to Leslie Kuhn, who worked as Howard Stern’s executive assistant.
| Agreement | Year | What It Covers | Kuhn’s Claim |
|---|---|---|---|
| Confidentiality Agreement | 2022 | Personal affairs of One Twelve, Stern’s family/friends, daily activities, habits, political views | "I never signed this!" |
| Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) | 2025 | Same broad protections | "I never signed this either!" |
Important Point: An NDA (Non-Disclosure Agreement) is a legal promise not to share secret or private information. Companies use them to protect sensitive details.
Kuhn claimed:
Justice Melissa Crane ruled that Kuhn knowingly agreed to the 2025 NDA. Here’s the smoking gun:
When asked to review the document, Kuhn wrote in an email: "Signed NDA attached."
The court noted:
Kuhn argued the company hacked her computer and forged her signature/email. The court said:
"Many employers can remotely manage work devices. That doesn’t mean they did hack your email or forge your signature."
Good news for Kuhn: Stern promised not to enforce the 2022 confidentiality agreement. The court said she already got "part of what she wanted."
CALL OUT: WHAT THIS MEANS FOR YOU
- If you sign an NDA (even by email), courts take it seriously
- "I didn’t read it" or "I didn’t mean it" usually won’t work
- Employers can monitor work devices – that’s normal, not proof of hacking
- Verbal promises matter less than written (or emailed) ones
| Who | What They Wanted | What Happened |
|---|---|---|
| Leslie Kuhn | Cancel both NDAs, speak freely | Lost – 2025 NDA stands |
| Howard Stern / One Twelve | Keep NDAs, sanction Kuhn | Kept 2025 NDA, No sanctions |
| The Court | Decide based on evidence | 2025 NDA valid; 2022 agreement not enforced |
Bottom line: Kuhn cannot publicize her experiences working for Stern and his wife. The 2025 NDA she emailed agreement to is legally binding.
Executed just means signed and made official. In this case, the court said Kuhn’s email ("Signed NDA attached") counted as executing the agreement.
Yes, absolutely. Most companies have the ability to manage, monitor, or wipe work devices. It’s standard practice—not evidence of hacking.
It means the employer claims the employee did something wrong (like breaking rules, poor performance, or misconduct)—not just downsizing or budget cuts.
Courts only impose sanctions (penalties) for bad faith—like lying on purpose or wasting the court’s time. The judge didn’t see proof she knew her claims were false.
Not about anything covered by the 2025 NDA. That agreement covers Stern’s personal life, family, habits, politics, and daily activities. Breaking it could lead to a lawsuit for damages.
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.