1
1A note to the reader: This is a sad story about a very sick little girl. It talks about hospitals, courts, and a family’s love. We have written it simply so everyone can understand what happened.
A 2-year-old girl named Annelise Camp drowned in a hotel pool on Memorial Day. She was rushed to Texas Children’s Hospital in Houston. Doctors there wanted to run tests to see if her brain had stopped working forever (this is called "brain death testing").
Annelise’s parents, Johnston and Joy Camp, did not want those tests yet. They believed she was still getting better and wanted more time. They went to court, won a temporary pause on the testing, and eventually moved her to another hospital. She lived for two more months with her family before she passed away peacefully after her breathing tube was removed.
Simple Explanation: In Texas, the law says a person is legally dead if their entire brain has stopped working forever and it can never come back. It is not the same as a coma or being "brain damaged." It means zero brain activity—no reflexes, no breathing drive, no response to pain.
The Camps believed Annelise was not brain dead.
Texas Children’s Hospital stated they needed the test to determine the next steps in her medical care. They also mentioned that other hospitals wouldn’t accept her transfer without the test results.
IMPORTANT POINT: The Difference Between "Withdrawing Care" and "Brain Death Testing"
This case highlights a tricky spot in medicine and law.
- Brain Death Testing: A medical exam to check if the brain has permanently stopped. If the test says "yes," the person is legally dead in Texas.
- Withdrawing Life Support: Stopping machines (like ventilators) that are keeping a body alive.
The hospital said they weren’t planning to withdraw care immediately. The parents feared that a "brain death" declaration would force the hospital to stop the machines by law. The court injunction bought them time to avoid that specific legal trigger.
The family never publicly shared the exact medical reason why they decided to remove the breathing tube on that final Monday.
Her grandfather, Steve Camp, wrote online:
"When this procedure was done, she passed very quickly."
Her parents released a heartbreaking but faithful statement:
"Annelise Camp ‘is now with Jesus’… While our hearts are broken, we trust in His perfect love, His faithfulness, and His promises."
A celebration of her life is scheduled for next Wednesday in Houston.
No. Texas Children’s Hospital explicitly stated in court documents that they had "no imminent plans to end care for Annelise." They wanted the test to guide medical decisions and facilitate a transfer.
The relationship between the family and the hospital broke down over the testing issue. The family felt the hospital was pushing for a declaration of death; the hospital felt testing was standard protocol. The court injunction allowed the transfer to a willing hospital in Louisiana.
Absolutely not. This is a very common confusion.
The article doesn’t give the hospitals’ specific reasons. Usually, hospitals decline complex transfers due to: lack of ICU beds, lack of specialized staff, insurance/network issues, or the medical complexity of a patient on a ventilator with an uncertain neurological prognosis. The one hospital that said "maybe" required the brain death test to know legally if they were accepting a living patient or a deceased donor.
They are grieving. They have a church service planned. They shared a GoFundMe page earlier to help with medical costs and "exploratory treatments." The community and the organizations that supported them (like Texas Right to Life) will likely continue to offer support.
This article was written based on reporting by the Associated Press (AP), The Texas Tribune, The New York Times, and local news stations KRIV-TV and FOX 26 Houston.