1
1
Imagine you’re trying to sell some toys at a garage sale. You have some nice items, but buyers keep saying, "I’ll take it only if I can’t find something better first." That’s exactly where the Cincinnati Reds find themselves right now.
The Reds have several players they could trade to other teams, but there’s a catch: none of them are anyone’s first choice.
Important Point: The Reds are currently 53-58 — that means they’ve lost 5 more games than they’ve won. They’re in last place in their division (the NL Central) and 5.5 games behind the last playoff spot. In baseball terms, their season is slipping away.
All of these players become free agents after this season, meaning the Reds would lose them for nothing if they don’t trade them now:
| Player | Position | What Teams Think |
|---|---|---|
| Brady Singer | Starting Pitcher | "Nice backup option" |
| Nathaniel Lowe | 1st Base/DH | "Solid fallback choice" |
| Brock Burke | Left-handed Reliever | "Good depth piece" |
| Caleb Ferguson | Left-handed Reliever | "Nice bullpen addition" |
| Eugenio Suárez | 3rd Base/DH | "Veteran backup plan" |
Key Insight: Being a "fallback option" means teams are waiting to see if they can get someone better first. The Reds are stuck waiting for other teams to make up their minds.
These players are the future of the franchise. The Reds would only trade them for an "obvious and overwhelming overpay" — think: getting a king’s ransom in return.
Think of it this way: These three are like the foundation of a house. You don’t sell the foundation unless someone offers you a mansion in return.
Two outfielders have more team control (won’t be free agents soon), so they have more trade value:
The Catch: The Reds don’t have ready-to-play replacements for either player in 2027. Trading them would create a hole they can’t easily fill.
| Category | Players | Likelihood of Trade |
|---|---|---|
| Core/Untouchable | Hunter Greene, Elly De La Cruz, Chase Burns | Extremely Low (only for massive overpay) |
| Trade Candidates (Expiring) | Tyler Stephenson, Brady Singer, Nathaniel Lowe, Brock Burke, Caleb Ferguson, Eugenio Suárez | Moderate (but viewed as fallback options) |
| Trade Candidates (Controlled) | JJ Bleday, Dane Myers | Low-Moderate (Reds lack 2027 replacements) |
The Reds are in a tricky spot: sellers with merchandise that buyers don’t urgently need. They’ll likely make some moves, but don’t expect fireworks — more like a quiet yard sale where the best items aren’t even priced to sell.
A: They’re the franchise cornerstones — young, incredibly talented, and under team control for five more years. Trading them would be like tearing down a house you just built. Only a truly ridiculous offer (think: multiple top prospects + major league stars) would even get the Reds to pick up the phone.
A: It means Team A (like the Yankees) likes Player X (Stephenson), but prefers Player Y (Goodman or Rutschman). Team A will wait on Player Y first. Only if they can’t get Player Y will they circle back to Player X. This gives the Reds less leverage — they can’t demand as much in return.
A: He becomes a free agent after the season and can sign with any team for zero compensation to the Reds. The Reds would get nothing but a draft pick (if they make a qualifying offer). That’s why trading him now — even as a fallback option — is better than losing him for almost nothing.
A: Burns is a highly touted young pitcher the Reds recently drafted and quickly signed to a contract extension. He represents the third pillar of their pitching future alongside Hunter Greene and another top prospect. The Reds locked him up early because they believe he’s a future ace.
A: The MLB trade deadline is typically July 31st at 6:00 PM ET. All trades must be completed by then for players to be eligible for postseason rosters with their new teams.