1
1
Imagine you work for a famous radio host and his wife. Things go wrong, you get fired, and then you sue them saying they forced you to sign secret papers (called NDAs) that weren’t even real. That’s basically what happened here — but the judge said "nope, those papers are real, and your lawsuit doesn’t hold up."
| Person | Role |
|---|---|
| Howard Stern | Famous radio host (72 years old), runs "The Howard Stern Show" on SiriusXM |
| Beth Stern | Howard’s wife, animal activist who fosters cats |
| Leslie Kuhn | Former assistant who worked for the Sterns from 2022–2026 |
| One Twelve | Howard Stern’s production company |
| The Judge | The person who made the final decision in court |
NDA = Non-Disclosure Agreement
A legal paper where you promise not to share private info about your employer. Like a "pinky swear" but with lawyers.
The court found an email from Kuhn’s own account that said:
"Signed NDA attached."
…along with her electronic signature.
The judge basically said: "You sent the signed NDA yourself. You can’t now say it was forged."
Kuhn’s lawsuit listed these problems:
Howard’s lawyer called the lawsuit:
"A thinly veiled attempted shakedown"
— Meaning: "She’s just trying to get hush money."
They also said:
"The Sterns are entitled to enforce nondisclosure agreements signed by employees who enter their home and their private life."
Howard filed a motion to dismiss the case — and the judge agreed.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
- The judge ruled the NDAs are valid — Kuhn signed them, end of story.
- "Bald assertion" = no evidence — You can’t just say something was forged; you need proof.
- Email evidence matters — Your own emails can be used against you in court.
- NDAs are common for household staff — Especially for celebrities who value privacy.
- Howard won’t enforce the 2022 NDA — But the 2025 one stands.
Howard Stern and his wife Beth won a lawsuit filed by their former executive assistant, Leslie Kuhn. She claimed they forged two NDAs and created a hostile work environment filled with too many foster cats and messy finances. The judge didn’t buy it. An email from Kuhn’s own account proved she signed the 2025 NDA. The forgery claim was dismissed as a "bald assertion" — legal speak for "you made that up." Howard’s team called it an attempted "shakedown" for hush money. The 2022 NDA won’t be enforced (Howard already said so), but the 2025 one is legit.
Yes. The court found an email from her account saying "Signed NDA attached" with her electronic signature. The judge said her forgery claim had no proof.
It’s a fancy legal term meaning "a claim made without any evidence to back it up." Basically, the judge said: "You’re just saying this — show me the receipts or it didn’t happen."
She was fired in February 2026 after getting a big raise. She claimed the work environment was hostile due to chaotic cat fostering, disorganized household management, and shady accounting. She wanted the NDAs thrown out so she could talk publicly.
No — he already agreed not to. But the 2025 NDA? That one’s enforceable, per the judge.
Pretty much. The judge dismissed Kuhn’s lawsuit. Unless she appeals (asks a higher court to review), this chapter is closed.
Want more celebrity legal drama explained simply? Stay tuned — there’s always another lawsuit around the corner!