1
1
On September 4, 2024, a terrible tragedy struck Apalachee High School in Winder, Georgia. A 16-year-old student named Colt Gray opened fire, killing four people and injuring several others. The victims included two students (Mason Schermerhorn and Christian Angulo) and two teachers (Richard Aspinwall and Cristina Irimie).
This article explains why Colt’s mother, Marcee Gray, will not face criminal charges—even though disturbing evidence came out about her behavior.
| Person | Role |
|---|---|
| Colt Gray | The 16-year-old shooter (now sentenced to life without parole + 20 years) |
| Colin Gray | Colt’s father — bought the AR-15 style rifle used in the shooting |
| Marcee Gray | Colt’s mother — lost custody years before the shooting |
| Brad Smith | Barrow County District Attorney (the top prosecutor) |
| Breanna Schermerhorn | Mother of Mason, one of the victims |
Colin Gray was charged and convicted in a landmark case. Here’s why:
Key Legal Concept: "Proximate Cause"
This means a direct link between someone’s action and the harm that happened. The DA said Colin’s action (buying/giving the gun) was a direct cause of the shooting. Marcee’s actions were not.
The District Attorney, Brad Smith, explained three main reasons:
DA Brad Smith’s Exact Words:
"At the end of the day, she did not have custody of Colt, she did not have proximity to Colt, and she was not the one that provided him the firearms."
After Colt was arrested, recorded jail phone calls between him and his mother were played in court. They shocked victims’ families.
| Behavior | Example from the Calls |
|---|---|
| Encouraging his obsession with mass shooters | Marcee called fan art of Colt alongside Columbine and Parkland shooters "really awesome!" |
| Trying to sneak contraband past guards | She looked for photos that "would not set off the alarm bells" at the youth detention center |
| Discussing his online "fan club" | They chatted casually about his "reputation" in true-crime communities online |
| Printing pictures of other killers | She offered to print out drawings of him with other school shooters |
Stephen Baker (Colt’s jail counselor): Inmates are not allowed to have photos of school shooters. Trying to pick "less noticeable" ones = skirting the rules.
The calls didn’t come out of nowhere. Marcee Gray lost custody years earlier for serious reasons.
Candice Broce (Director, Division of Family & Children Services):
"I was really surprised by, like, the complete absence of care… I found enough evidence that she was physically abusing him."
She admitted to the slap but said: "A slap of a disrespectful teenager who was bigger than I was… is a far cry from long-term abuse and neglect. I was never abusive to any of my children. Ever."
You might wonder: If there’s evidence of abuse, why no charges?
John Acevedo (Emory Law Professor):
"They’re definitely distasteful, but not criminal."The jail calls happened after the shooting — you can’t charge someone for "encouraging" a crime that already happened.
DA Brad Smith:
"I don’t know that I have the stomach for a trial where Colt Gray is the victim."
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| Did Marcee Gray cause the shooting? | No — she didn’t have custody, wasn’t nearby, didn’t provide the gun |
| Were her jail calls disturbing? | Yes — she encouraged his obsession with mass killers and tried to break detention rules |
| Was she a bad mother? | The state found 12 categories of abuse/neglect and removed her children years before |
| Can she be charged for the shooting? | No — no "proximate cause" under Georgia law |
| Can she be charged for past abuse? | Technically yes, but practically no — would require making the shooter a victim in court |
| What happened to the father? | 15 years in prison for buying/giving the gun used in the shooting |
| What happened to Colt? | Life without parole + 20 years — he pleaded guilty to 55 counts |
Very unlikely. The DA has clearly stated he won’t pursue charges. For the shooting, there’s no legal pathway. For past abuse, the practical barriers (using Colt as a witness) make it almost impossible.
Direct causation. Colin bought the murder weapon and gave it to his son. That’s a clear, direct link under Georgia law. Marcee had no role in obtaining the gun.
Think of it like a chain of dominoes. The person who pushes the first domino that leads to the harm is the "proximate cause." Colin pushed the domino (bought the gun). Marcee wasn’t even in the room.
The jail calls suggest she knew about his obsession with mass shooters and encouraged it. But knowing your child has disturbing interests isn’t the same as legally causing a shooting — especially when you don’t have custody or access to guns.
She remains free (though she has a prior criminal record for trespassing and damaging her ex-husband’s truck). Her parental rights were terminated — Colt is in foster care/state custody. She has expressed remorse, saying she’ll "spend the rest of my life in heartbreaking regret."
This case shows how complicated the law can be — especially when tragedy involves families with deep, pre-existing problems. The father’s decision to buy a gun for his troubled son created a clear legal path to accountability. The mother’s years of neglect and disturbing post-shooting behavior, while morally repulsive to many, didn’t cross the legal line for criminal charges in this specific tragedy.
The victims’ families have seen some justice (Colt and his father in prison), but for many, Marcee Gray’s freedom remains a painful, unresolved chapter.