Popular Posts

The Douthat Decade: How One Columnist Reshaped Conservatism

Ross Douthat Leaves the New York Times: A Farewell to a Unique Voice

Important Context
Ross Douthat was a conservative Christian columnist at the New York Times for about a decade. His departure to join a new TV venture run by Bari Weiss marks the end of an era for readers who valued his careful, nuanced take on religion, politics, and technology.


Who Is Ross Douthat and Why Did His Column Matter?

Imagine if your favorite thoughtful teacher—the one who always explained both sides of an argument before giving their own view—suddenly announced they were leaving to host a TV show. That’s how many readers felt when Ross Douthat left the New York Times.

  • He wrote for a liberal audience but from a conservative Christian perspective.
  • He didn’t shout. He made distinctions. He admitted when things were complicated.
  • He became a "touchstone"—a reliable reference point—during chaotic years (roughly 2015 onward) when politics and culture felt like they were shaking apart.

The "Bari Weiss Empire" Joke (That’s Kind of True)

The article jokes about an "iron law" of media: Everyone talented eventually gets hired by Bari Weiss.

  • Bari Weiss is a journalist who left the Times to start her own media company (The Free Press) and now runs a new version of 60 Minutes.
  • Writers and editors—from unknown assistants to famous intellectuals—keep joining her projects.
  • Once they do, they often stop writing for anyone else. The joke: they’re "lost to the Bari Weiss Empire."

Douthat’s Greatest Hits: Five Big Ideas You Should Know

1. Immigration: Look at the Politics, Not Just the Ideals (2016)

In "Ten Theses on Immigration," Douthat told progressive readers:

  • You can argue immigration is good in theory.
  • But in practice, ignoring cultural backlash leads to political failure.
  • Key line: "Native backlash against perceived cultural transformation is very powerful, and any politics that refuses to take account of it will fail."
  • He distinguished: Punctuated immigration encourages assimilation; constant immigration limits it.

2. Wokeness as a Quasi-Religion That Might Self-Destruct (2022)

He compared the "Great Awokening" (intense social-justice activism) to a religion:

  • It demands theological conformity.
  • But using power too overtly creates backlash.
  • It may look solid—like the Soviet Union under Brezhnev or 19th-century Boston Brahmin rule—but can’t survive a real crisis.
  • Verdict: Events since 2022 suggest he was right.

3. Technology & AI: A "Mass-Extinction Bottleneck" (2025)

Douthat warns that smartphones and AI create a bottleneck—a narrow passage where much of human culture could be lost:

  • Virtual life becomes more attractive than real life.
  • What’s at risk: Languages, churches, political ideas, art forms, literacy, even reproduction.
  • Only "deliberate, self-conscious, slightly fanatical" people will preserve what they love.

Critique Note: The author thinks Douthat sometimes treats this as inevitable, not driven by specific corporate choices (monopoly power, profit motives). But his description of the era and the virtues needed (intentionality, discipline) remains essential.

4. Religion: Stop Apologizing, Start Arguing (2021)

Douthat told fellow believers:

  • Don’t just cite health benefits ("churchgoers live 19 months longer").
  • Don’t just say it’s "comforting" or "there must be something more."
  • Don’t hide behind politics.
  • Make the intellectual case: Atheism is a stretch; belief in God is extremely plausible.

5. The Pope Francis Era: Defending Doctrine When It Was "Kicked Around Like Footballs"

During a turbulent time in the Catholic Church (roughly 2013–2020):

  • Core teachings were publicly debated.
  • Even the retired Pope Benedict made cryptic warnings about the "barque of Peter" (the Church) nearly shipwrecking.
  • Douthat’s persistent, reasonable columns in the world’s top newspaper:
    • Blunted attacks on Church teaching.
    • Exposed intellectual weaknesses in critics’ arguments.
    • Cut through soothing talk of "doctrinal development."

Why His Writing Style Was Rare (And Why We’ll Miss It)

Most Opinion Writing Douthat’s Approach
Picks a side, attacks the other Argues by making distinctions
Assumes bad faith Assumes good faith (almost "Dominican" habit)
Simple slogans Nuance, generosity, irony
Forgets context Historical perspective (Brezhnev, Boston Brahmins)
Preaches to the choir Speaks to a secular liberal audience using reason, not just Scripture

The peak example: "Letter to the Catholic Academy" (2015)
The author recalls reading it with a housemate over tea—a real event. It moved from gentle self-deprecation to noble anger for the true, the good, and the beautiful.


What’s Next for Douthat?

He’s trading the columnist’s soapbox (writing weekly opinions) for the TV correspondent’s roving camera (reporting, interviewing, showing).

  • He admits in a 2026 column: He doesn’t quite know what’s going on or what to think.
  • That honesty—admitting confusion in a confusing time—is exactly why his voice was trusted.
  • On TV, he’ll likely bring the same habits: ask hard questions, make distinctions, resist easy narratives.

Summary

  • Ross Douthat spent ~10 years as a conservative Christian columnist at the New York Times.
  • He left to join Bari Weiss’s new 60 Minutes—part of a trend where top talent moves to her ventures.
  • His unique strengths: nuance, historical perspective, arguing from reason not just faith, speaking across divides.
  • Five landmark contributions:
    1. Immigration: politics matters as much as principles.
    2. Wokeness: a fragile hegemony that breeds its own backlash.
    3. Tech/AI: a cultural bottleneck requiring intentional resistance.
    4. Religion: argue for God’s plausibility, not just utility.
    5. Catholic doctrine: steady defense during institutional chaos.
  • His style—ironic, even-handed, distinction-making—made him readable even for those who disagreed.
  • Now: He takes his habits to television, where confusion is honest and questions matter more than slogans.

FAQ

Q: Who is Bari Weiss and why does the article call it an "empire"?
A: Bari Weiss is a journalist who left the New York Times to found The Free Press and now leads a revived 60 Minutes. The "empire" is a half-joke: many talented writers and editors keep joining her projects, then stop freelancing elsewhere.

Q: What does "Great Awokening" mean?
A: It’s a term (used by critics) for the surge in progressive social-justice activism ~2015–2022—comparing its fervor, moral certainty, and demand for conformity to historical religious "Great Awakenings."

Q: Why does the author criticize Douthat on technology?
A: Douthat frames cultural loss (languages, churches, literacy) as an inevitable bottleneck. The author thinks this downplays how specific corporate decisions (monopoly power, profit-driven design) accelerate the damage.

Q: What is the "Athanasius role" mentioned in the article?
A: Athanasius was a 4th-century bishop who stood almost alone against Arian heresy. The "Athanasius role" = being a lonely defender of orthodoxy. The author says Douthat was unsuited for it (too ironic, too even-handed)—yet still played it effectively.

Q: Will Douthat still write, or only do TV?
A: The article doesn’t say he’ll stop writing entirely. But his primary platform shifts from a weekly Times column to TV reporting for Weiss’s 60 Minutes. His voice will now be seen and heard, not just read.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *