1
1
Imagine your favorite player on your neighborhood baseball team is packing his bags. That’s basically what’s happening with Tyler Stephenson, the Cincinnati Reds’ longtime catcher.
Important Point
Stephenson is a "rental player" — this is baseball talk for someone in the final year of their contract. The Reds haven’t signed him to an extension, which strongly suggests 2026 will be his last season in Cincinnati.
He might even be traded before the season ends. So the Reds need a Plan B — and fast.
If Stephenson leaves, the Reds’ "catching cupboard" looks pretty bare. Here’s who they have right now:
| Player | Situation | Verdict |
|---|---|---|
| Jose Trevino | Veteran backup | Can hold the fort for a few months, but past his prime as a starter |
| Will Banfield | Only other catcher on the 40-man roster | Likely a third-stringer for his whole career |
| P.J. Higgins | Triple-A backup | Same boat as Banfield — not a long-term answer |
The future hope: Alfredo Duno — one of the best catching prospects in baseball. But he’s young and inexperienced:
The Gap: The Reds need a starting catcher for at least 2027 — maybe longer. Duno isn’t ready yet.
The St. Louis Cardinals (the Reds’ division rival) have a catching goldmine:
They have too many catchers and are widely expected to trade at least one before the deadline. On paper, a Reds–Cardinals trade makes sense.
Here’s why the Reds should pump the brakes on a blockbuster deal with St. Louis:
All Cardinals catchers are under team control through at least 2029. That means:
Real-World Example
Last year, the San Diego Padres traded a huge package for Freddy Fermin — a 30-year-old career backup catcher. That’s how valuable "team control" is.
Trading within your division costs extra. The Cardinals would charge the Reds even more because they’d have to face that catcher 13+ times a year.
To get someone like Iván Herrera, the Reds would likely have to give up:
Bottom Line: Giving up premium talent to a division rival for a player you might not even need in 2028 (when Duno arrives) is bad business.
He’s still very young and has barely played at Double-A. Catchers take longer to develop because they have to learn pitching staffs, game-calling, and framing. Rushing him could ruin his confidence and development.
It means the Cardinals own that player’s rights for the next several seasons at a reasonable (pre-free agency) salary. That makes the player incredibly valuable — like having a coupon for a great player at a discount price for years.
Teams hate making rivals better. If the Cardinals trade a catcher to the Reds, they’ll face him ~13 times a year. So they demand extra value (better prospects) to offset that pain.
Absolutely! Teams like the Guardians, Rays, or Dodgers often have catching depth. Trading outside the division avoids the "tax" and keeps the talent away from direct competitors.
Not "bad" — he’s a great defensive catcher and clubhouse leader. But at 32, his offense has declined, and he’s best used as a platoon/backup, not an everyday starter for a contending team.
Let the Cardinals keep their catching hoard. The Reds’ smart move is patience — not a panic trade that mortgages the future for a player Duno might replace in two years anyway.