11
Why Is AIPAC Pouring Millions Into Beating El-Sayed?
The Big Money Battle in Michigan’s Senate Race: A Simple Guide
What’s Happening in Michigan?
Imagine a school election where one candidate has a giant piggy bank filled by a few rich kids, while the other candidate collects small donations from lots of regular students. That’s basically what’s happening right now in Michigan’s Democratic Senate primary.
Abdul El-Sayed (a doctor and former health official) is running against Haley Stevens (a four-term Congresswoman) to replace Senator Gary Peters. But the real story isn’t just about the candidates—it’s about the over $60 million being spent by outside groups, especially one called AIPAC.
Who Are the Main Players?
| Person/Group | What They Do | Simple Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Abdul El-Sayed | Candidate | Progressive doctor who wants to represent regular people |
| Haley Stevens | Candidate | Current Congresswoman, more establishment Democrat |
| AIPAC | Pro-Israel lobbying group | Powerful organization spending huge money on elections |
| United Democracy Project (UDP) | AIPAC’s election arm | The "super PAC" that actually spends the money |
| Dark Money Groups | Secretive nonprofits | Organizations that hide who gives them money |
The Money Trail: Where Does $60 Million Come From?
AIPAC’s Record-Breaking Spending
Important Point: AIPAC has spent $30.6 million just on this ONE race—their highest ever for a primary!
How it works:
- AIPAC (a "social welfare nonprofit") collects money from donors without revealing their names
- They pass it to their election arm, United Democracy Project (UDP)
- UDP spends it on ads supporting Stevens and attacking El-Sayed
- This is called "dark money"—like a secret pipeline
Who Funds UDP? (The Rich Donors We Know About)
- Paul Singer – Hedge fund billionaire, Trump supporter
- Robert Kraft – Owner of the New England Patriots (via Kraft Group)
- Marc Rowan – Head of a giant investment firm
- Haim Saban – Entertainment executive
- David Cordish – Real estate developer
- Blair Frank – Investment banker
Think of it like this: A few ultra-rich people are trying to pick Michigan’s Senator from thousands of miles away.
The "Russian Doll" PAC Structure
The other $30+ million comes from a confusing chain of groups:
Center Forward (nonprofit)
↓
A Stronger Michigan PAC ($17M)
↓
Michigan Forward 2026 PAC
↓
Funded by: Daniel Lubetzky + American Chemistry Council + Another nonprofit
Plus more groups:
- Center Forward Committee ($900K) – funded by Chevron, UnitedHealth
- Unite to Win ($4M) – funded by a PAC that… hasn’t raised money this year?
How Much Did the ACTUAL Campaigns Raise?
| Candidate | Direct Donations (from regular people) | Outside PAC Support |
|---|---|---|
| El-Sayed | $14.5 million | ~$3.5 million |
| Stevens | $11.9 million | $60+ million |
Key difference: El-Sayed gets money from lots of small donors. Stevens gets a fraction from people, but a MOUNTAIN from secretive PACs.
What the Candidates Say
Haley Stevens’ Defense
"I don’t think there’s much difference between super PACs going in for Abdul or super PACs going in for me. We have a problem with campaign finance reform in this country."
El-Sayed’s supporters reply: "The difference is $56 million!"
Also interesting: Stevens’ website has a "media" section that looks like it gives talking points and silent video footage custom-made for AIPAC’s ads.
Abdul El-Sayed’s Attack
"Donald Trump is not the disease; he’s just the first symptom. The disease is this system that allows billionaires and special interests like AIPAC to buy and sell politicians."
At a debate, he connected the dots:
"Stevens voted to send $3.3 BILLION of your tax dollars to Israel. That’s the ‘pro quo’ for the ‘quid’ of $30 million from AIPAC."
AIPAC’s Response
"As proud, pro-Israel Americans, we will never apologize for participating in the political process and standing up to those who undermine our shared values."
They say they’re not a foreign lobby—just Americans who support Israel.
Who’s Helping El-Sayed? (The Other Side)
| Group | Money Spent | Funded By |
|---|---|---|
| Fighting for Michigan | ~$3.5M total | Progressive donors, pro-Palestine groups |
| Institute for Middle East Understanding | Part of above | Nonprofit |
| El-Sayed’s father-in-law | $300,000 | Personal |
| Saikat Chakrabarti | $250,000 | Progressive activist |
| Labor unions & progressive groups | Modest amounts | Phone banking, organizing |
Why This Race Matters So Much
For the Palestinian Rights Movement
If El-Sayed wins despite $60M against him, it proves:
- Voters care more than money
- AIPAC can be beaten
- The Democratic Party is shifting on Israel
For Control of the Senate
Michigan is a swing state (voted Trump in 2016 & 2024). This seat could decide which party controls the Senate after November.
For the Democratic Party’s Soul
Progressives have won House seats in safe blue districts. But winning a statewide race in a purple state like Michigan? That would be an earthquake.
IMPORTANT POINTS TO REMEMBER
KEY TAKEAWAYS:
- $60M+ from OUTSIDE groups vs. $14.5M from PEOPLE – that’s the real race
- Dark money hides who’s really pulling the strings
- AIPAC spent a RECORD $30.6M to defeat ONE candidate critical of Israel
- El-Sayed OUTRAISED Stevens from actual voters ($14.5M vs $11.9M)
- Stevens’ campaign materials appear coordinated with AIPAC’s ads
- This isn’t just about Michigan – it’s a test for the entire Democratic Party
- The winner faces Republican Mike Rogers in November – control of Senate may hinge on this
Summary
Michigan’s Senate primary has become the most expensive primary in history because of one issue: Israel policy. AIPAC and its web of secretive PACs have poured over $60 million to defeat Abdul El-Sayed, a progressive doctor who criticizes unconditional aid to Israel. Meanwhile, El-Sayed has raised more money from actual voters than his opponent, Haley Stevens.
Stevens says "both sides have PACs," but the gap is $56 million. Her campaign website even seems to feed content to AIPAC’s ads. El-Sayed argues this proves she’s "bought," while AIPAC insists they’re just proud Americans exercising free speech.
If El-Sayed wins Tuesday, it sends a shockwave: big money can’t always buy elections, and the Democratic Party’s stance on Israel is changing. If Stevens wins, it confirms AIPAC’s power to punish critics—even in a state with one of America’s largest Arab-American communities.
Either way, this race has exposed how dark money works—and voters are watching.
FAQ: Your Questions Answered
Q: What exactly is a "super PAC" and how is it different from a regular campaign?
A: A super PAC (Political Action Committee) can raise and spend unlimited money from corporations, unions, and individuals—but legally cannot coordinate with the candidate’s official campaign. Regular campaigns have strict limits ($3,500 per person) but can coordinate directly with the candidate.
Q: What is "dark money" and why is it legal?
A: Dark money comes from nonprofits (like 501(c)(4)s) that don’t have to disclose donors. They can give unlimited sums to super PACs. It’s legal because the Supreme Court ruled (Citizens United) that spending money = free speech, and nonprofits have privacy rights. Critics say it lets rich donors buy influence in secret.
Q: Why does AIPAC spend so much on a Democrat vs. Democrat primary?
A: AIPAC targets any candidate—Republican or Democrat—who criticizes Israeli government policies or supports conditioning aid. They want to make an example of critics so others stay silent. El-Sayed has called for conditioning aid and criticized Gaza policy, making him a top target.
Q: Can voters actually see who’s funding these ads?
A: Sometimes. Super PACs must disclose donors to the FEC. But dark money nonprofits don’t. And when a nonprofit funds a PAC that funds another PAC (the "Russian doll"), the original source gets buried. Journalists and watchdogs try to trace it, but it’s deliberately difficult.
Q: What happens after Tuesday’s primary?
A: The winner faces Mike Rogers (Republican) in November. Michigan is a swing state—Trump won it twice recently. This seat could decide Senate control. Also, the primary result sends a message nationally: either "AIPAC can be beaten" or "Don’t cross AIPAC."
