1
1
Imagine you’re the president of a big club — like the world’s biggest soccer club, FIFA. Now imagine that club has a rule: "Stay out of politics and remain neutral." That means you shouldn’t pick sides, cheer for political candidates, or hand out awards that look like you’re trying to win favor with world leaders.
That’s exactly the problem some people have with FIFA’s President, Gianni Infantino. He awarded a brand-new award called the FIFA Peace Prize to U.S. President Donald Trump in December 2025. A lot of people think this broke FIFA’s own rules about staying politically neutral.
Now, 50 members of the European Parliament (MEPs) — basically, lawmakers from across Europe — have written a letter telling FIFA: "Hey, you need to look at this."
A human rights advocacy group called FairSquare filed an official ethics complaint. Think of them like a watchdog organization that keeps an eye on big sports institutions and makes sure they’re doing the right thing.
Their complaint says Infantino broke FIFA’s rule about political neutrality — not once, but four times. Here’s what they say happened:
Breach #1: Infantino publicly said on Instagram that Trump "definitely deserves the Nobel Peace Prize" for his role in a Middle East ceasefire deal. FairSquare says this was a personal endorsement of Trump in a highly political situation.
Breach #2: At a business conference in Miami on November 5, Infantino called Trump "a really close friend" and said people should support his political agenda. FairSquare argues a top sports official shouldn’t be taking such clear political sides in public.
Breach #3: During the World Cup draw ceremony at the Kennedy Center, a FIFA-produced video seemed to echo Trump’s claims that he had ended multiple wars around the world. Infantino then told Trump on stage: "This is what we want from a leader … you definitely deserve the first FIFA Peace Prize." FairSquare says this was a clear endorsement of Trump’s foreign policy.
Here’s another big issue: It doesn’t look like Infantino followed FIFA’s own internal rules. FairSquare’s complaint points out that the FIFA Council — which is like the board of directors for world soccer — was never consulted about creating the prize or choosing who should get it.
Important Point: FIFA’s own statutes say the Council is supposed to define FIFA’s strategic direction and policies. Critics argue that creating a major new award like the Peace Prize should have gone through the Council, but it didn’t.
Even Lise Klaveness, the president of the Norwegian Football Association, publicly criticized the fact that Infantino made this decision without consulting anyone.
50 MEPs from countries including Ireland, Germany, Spain, France, Belgium, Italy, Luxembourg, Denmark, Slovakia, and the Netherlands signed a letter demanding that FIFA take the complaint seriously.
Key people who organized the letter include:
In their letter, they said FIFA needs to show that it upholds:
They also asked that the letter be shared with all FIFA Council members so everyone is aware of the concerns.
FIFA has something called the Independent Ethics Committee. It has two parts:
| Chamber | What It Does | Meeting Frequency |
|---|---|---|
| Investigatory Chamber | Investigates possible rule-breaking | Meets regularly |
| Adjudicatory Chamber | Decides on punishments | Meets regularly |
The investigatory committee has nine members from countries including Rwanda, China, Canada, Malaysia, Greece, Kenya, Argentina, Vanuatu, and Panama. It’s chaired by Martin Ngoga from Rwanda.
Possible punishments for breaking FIFA’s rules include:
| Side | Position |
|---|---|
| FairSquare | Infantino broke FIFA’s own rules by taking a clear political side |
| 50 MEPs | FIFA must respond to the complaint and prove it values fairness and neutrality |
| Norwegian FA | Infantino should have consulted the FIFA Council before awarding the prize |
| Infantino / FIFA | No public comment available |
| White House | No public comment available |
FairSquare did note that FIFA’s relationship with the U.S. government is unavoidable — after all, the U.S. is co-hosting the men’s World Cup in 2026. They said FIFA can definitely have a professional, diplomatic relationship. But Infantino, they argue, went way beyond that by openly championing Trump’s political agenda.
Here’s the whole story in a nutshell:
Q: What is the FIFA Peace Prize?
A: It’s a brand-new award created by FIFA President Gianni Infantino. Donald Trump was the first and, so far, only recipient. It was presented during the World Cup draw in December 2025 in Washington, D.C.
Q: Why is giving Trump an award a problem?
A: FIFA has a clear rule in its Code of Ethics requiring all officials to remain politically neutral. Critics argue that Infantino didn’t just give Trump an award — he publicly praised Trump’s policies, called him a close friend, and used language associated with Trump’s political campaign. That goes well beyond a diplomatic relationship.
Q: Who are the 50 MEPs and why do they care?
A: They are lawmakers from the European Parliament representing ten different European countries. They signed a letter saying FIFA needs to uphold its stated values of fairness, equality, and respect for human dignity by properly addressing the ethics complaint.
Q: Could Infantino actually face punishment?
A: Yes. If FIFA’s Ethics Committee finds that he broke the Code of Ethics, he could face anything from a warning to a fine to a ban from all football-related activities. However, it remains to be seen whether the committee will open a formal investigation.
Q: Was the FIFA Peace Prize itself illegal or against FIFA rules?
A: The complaint argues that FIFA’s own statutes say the FIFA Council should have been involved in creating such a prize. Since the Council wasn’t consulted, the process itself may have been improper — regardless of who received the award.